AI, Employment and Salami Tactics

THIS IS NOT INVESTMENT ADVICE. INVESTING IS RISKY AND OFTEN PAINFUL. DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH.

AI and a radical shift in US government policy are hitting the global economy at the same time. Together, these forces may lead to falling US employment and inflation. If that occurs, everything the trading consensus is positioned for—a strong dollar, higher bond yields and higher US stock prices—may turn out to be wrong.

AI and Employment

We know AI and robotics are changing how we operate. The question is the pace at which the AI dents demand for labor relative to the rate at which AI creates new jobs. My hunch is the hit to labor demand can happen more suddenly than people think.

One way of ascertaining the rate of change is to observe your own behavior. Twenty-four months ago, a group of enthusiastic volunteers proofread my posts. Now I use AI. Similarly, I used to build complex models to value a stock or a bond. Now my first stop is AI, which churns out models that are better than a first-year analyst.

I asked experts who comb through employment and earnings reports about the impact of AI on jobs. So far, they don’t have hard evidence jobs are being displaced even though from a commonsense standpoint, we know they are. I backed out a more hacky way to look at the question. I selected the main categories of both CPI (inflation) and employment and fed them into an AI bot and asked it what the likely changes were. As you can see, AI hits every component of CPI, often in ways I did not anticipate, like using drones to lower the cost of construction.

Add in to that that the Administration is firing a lot of government workers and the odds of weaker employment numbers are rising. This is not in expectations. The Fed is largely expected to have stopped easing. Note in the most recent report government jobs were 22% of the recent jobs created. That will now go flat ore even negative.

Yes, claims for unemployment are rising, but not yet sharply. However, when there are turns in data, by definition this will diverge from past data.

The Salami Slicer and Ukraine

The firing of federal workers intersects with the overall policy tilt—salami tactics. The term was coined by Matyas Rakosi, the former communist boss of Hungary. By this he meant eliminating opposition in small, seemingly insignificant steps, until nothing remained. That is what is going on in the US. Gradually rule of law is being sliced away. Examples are pardoning those convicted of January 6, freeing the convicted Illinois governor, dropping charges on the New York Mayor, reneging on signed trade treaties—the message is clear, if you are loyal, the rule of law doesn’t apply. And if you aren’t? Look out.

This same template is being applied to Ukraine, though perhaps in Ukraine’s case this is less salami slicer and more meat cleaver. Ukraine does not have leverage. They are small, poor and being attacked by a homicidal neighbor. The Administration is saying “give us your minerals, we might protect your borders,” roughly similar to the British empire in Africa. Russia has a similar rubric, only more expansive. Not only do they want Ukraine’s minerals and agriculture (the breadbasket of Europe) they want the entire swath of territory they have held intermittently for long stretches of time, thus their request that NATO pull back. This mimics the Administrations claims toward Canada and Greenland. The demands are symmetrical, though Russia has a history of killing and incarcerating their neighbors that the US lacks.

The gap with policy precedent is glaring. Recall, the US Marshall plan. In today’s dollars, the US gave $180 billion to Europe after World War II and asked in return for free trade and cooperation combating Communism, or, in plain English, the Kremlin. Now, the agenda is constricting free trade and cooperating with the Kremlin. The logical consequence of these two forces (AI/firing, and salami tactics) would seem to be less confidence in US financial markets and the dollar. Again, so far there are only modest signs of this in the prices but, by the time it is obvious, it will be too late. The ingredients for a violent reversal in pricing are increasing.

This document is strictly confidential and is intended for authorized recipients of “A Letter from Paul” (the “Letter”) only. It includes personal opinions that are current as of the date of this Letter and does not represent the official positions of Kate Capital LLC (“Kate Capital”). This letter is presented for discussion purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, an offer, or solicitation with respect to the purchase or sale of any security. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure, or distribution of the material in this presentation is strictly forbidden without the express written consent of Paul Podolsky or Kate Capital LLC.

If an investment idea is discussed in the Letter, there is no guarantee that the investment objective will be achieved. Past performance is not indicative of future results, which may vary. Actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied. Unless otherwise noted, the valuation of the specific investment opportunity contained within this presentation is based upon information and data available as of the date these materials were prepared.

An investment with Kate Capital is speculative and involves significant risks, including the potential loss of all or a substantial portion of invested capital, the potential use of leverage, and the lack of liquidity of an investment. Recipients should not assume that securities or any companies identified in this presentation, or otherwise related to the information in this presentation, are, have been or will be, investments held by accounts managed by Kate Capital or that investments in any such securities have been or will be profitable. Please refer to the Private Placement Memorandum, and Kate Capital’s Form ADV, available at www.advisorinfo.sec.gov, for important information about an investment with Kate Capital.

Any companies identified herein in which Kate Capital is invested do not represent all of the investments made or recommended for any account managed by Kate Capital. Certain information presented herein has been supplied by third parties, including management or agents of the underlying portfolio company. While Kate Capital believes such information to be accurate, it has relied upon such third parties to provide accurate information and has not independently verified such information.

The graphs, charts, and other visual aids are provided for informational purposes only. None of these graphs, charts, or visual aids can of themselves be used to make investment decisions. No representation is made that these will assist any person in making investment decisions and no graph, chart or other visual aid can capture all factors and variables required in making such decisions.